Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Group Claims Kerry Really Won Ohio in 2004 - And They Have Proof

Is this sour grapes or incontrovertible evidence? You decide. –IFK Editor

The Gun is Smoking - 2004 Ohio Precinct-Level Exit Poll Data Show Virtually Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount

The National Election Data Archive (NEDA) is the first mathematical team to release a valid scientific analysis of the precinct-level 2004 Ohio presidential exit poll data. NEDA's analysis provides virtually irrefutable evidence of vote miscount.

(PRWEB) January 17, 2006 -- There is significant controversy about whether the 2004 presidential election was conducted fairly and its votes counted correctly. According to results of the major national election exit poll conducted for the National Election Pool by Edison/Mitofsky (E/M), Kerry won Ohio's pivotal vote, though the official tally gave the state, and thus the presidency, to Bush. The conduct of Ohio's election was formally debated by Congress in January 2005.

The National Election Data Archive (NEDA) is the first mathematical team to release a valid scientific analysis of the precinct-level 2004 Ohio presidential exit poll data "The Gun is Smoking: 2004 Ohio Precinct-level Exit Poll Data Show Virtually Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount" available at http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/OH/Ohio-Exit-Polls-2004.pdf. NEDA's analysis provides significant evidence of an outcome-altering vote miscount.

The analysis is based on the most accurate statistical method yet devised for determining whether exit poll error, random variations, or vote count manipulation cause the discrepancies between exit polls and official vote tallies. This analysis method was made public recently by NEDA in "Vote Miscounts or Exit Poll Error? New Mathematical Function for Analyzing Exit Poll Discrepancy" available at http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit-Poll-Analysis.pdf

Exit Polls were conducted in 49 of Ohio’s 11,360 precincts. At least 40% of Ohio's polled precincts show statistically significant differences between Kerry’s exit poll percent and official vote count percent. 35% of these exit polls overestimated the Kerry official vote share. This is five times the number expected. Three of the most glaring examples are:

1. In E/M precinct 27, with an estimated 100 respondents, Kerry’s official vote count was 29% less than his exit poll share, creating a 58% difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins. There is less than a one in 867,205,500 chance of this occurring due to chance.

2. In E/M precinct 25, with an estimated 62 respondents, Kerry’s official vote count was 28% less than his exit poll share, creating a 56% difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins. There is less than a one in 234,800 chance of this occurring due to chance.

3. In E/M precinct 48, with an estimated 100 respondents, Kerry's official vote was 16% less than his exit poll share, creating a 32% difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins. There is less than a one in 17,800 chance of this occurring due to chance.

There are also two precincts where the Bush official vote count is significantly less than the Bush exit poll share. The number of significant discrepancies and the pattern of Ohio's discrepancy shown in the NEDA report provide strong support for the conclusion that vote count errors converted a Kerry win to a Bush win.

New electronic voting equipment without voter verified paper ballots, implemented under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, makes it easier for a small number of people to manipulate vote counts and nearly impossible to independently audit vote count accuracy. Virtually every county in America today publicly reports its vote counts in a way that hides evidence of miscounts. This allows those with access (whether authorized or not) to manipulate or make mistakes in vote counting with negligible possibility of detection.

Without accurate elections, America is not a democracy. NEDA urges the media to publicize the results of this report and its recommendations, in order to return to the American people their right to determine the country’s leaders.

About the National Election Data Archive
The National Election Data Archive is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose mission is to scientifically investigate the accuracy of elections through the creation and analysis of a database containing precinct-level vote-type election data for the entire United States. By making detailed election data publicly available NEDA furthers its goal of providing the means for independent analysts to evaluate the accuracy of vote counts in time to ensure that properly elected candidates are sworn into office following future elections.

###

2 Comments:

Blogger Max Chapman said...

I’m a strong supporter of John Kerry. I’ve had the privilege of meeting Senator Kerry and other Kerry family members (Cam Kerry, Alexandra and Vanessa Kerry). I grew up in Massachusetts and followed his career from his election as Lieutenant Governor in 1982, to his defeat of Bill Weld in 1996. I worked on his Presidential campaign in the Democratic Primary. I’m a Kerry man, but I don’t believe these conspiracy theories that Kerry really won Ohio. If he or his campaign believed he did, he would be President. That chapter is over. That was a crushing loss for the country and the world. John Kerry lost, people that want better jobs lost, seniors lost, minorities lost, our troops in Iraq lost and our allies lost. I’m focused electing Cam Kerry Secretary of State in Massachusetts and electing a new President in 2008, we need change in America. Supporters of Senator Kerry need to stop the conspiracy theories and work on more positive things.

10:16 AM  
Blogger i11ustrator said...

Max,

Thanks for your post and all your hard work to elect problem solvers (democrats).

I agree Bush won Ohio and thus the Presidency, and there wasn't any evidence to prove otherwise in a court of law, especially in a process that was presided over by Republicans, however I am in favor of strong voting reforms to make future elections more transparent and make sure there is never any doubt again.

Whether you believe the conspiracy theorists or not is almost irrelevant. There were many documented voting irregularities, which may not have reversed the outcome, but are still unacceptable and make the possibility of fair and transparent elections less likely.

That's not a shining example of democracy in my book. Reform is key to democrats winning, along with having dems elected to state and local positions to make sure the people's interests are truly protected.

Kerry ON! Go Cam.

I wholeheartedly agree Dems should look forward not back, but we should learn from our past mistakes and push for reforms as well as fight for what we believe.

-IFK Editor

10:01 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home