Tuesday, March 29, 2005

News Organizations that Repeated Swift Boat Vets Lies Could be Liable

Shortly after the election results of 2004 I wrote that Kerry's team should go after the Swift Boat Liars with a defamation suit. Now it appears there is legal precedence that could be used to form a case. On Monday the Supreme Court refused to shield the news media from being sued for accurately reporting a politician's false charges against a rival.

If Kerry hopes to regain his reputation and show he's a fighter I urge him or his team to bring a case against Fox News and other high profile news organizations who broadcast the wildly false accusations of the Swift Boat Liars around the clock for weeks during August. More than standing up for his own reputation a lawsuit could make it more difficult for future GOP false and disgustingly baseless attacks. -IFK Editor

Justices Refuse to Shield Reports of False Charges

In their appeal to the high court, lawyers for the paper said news organizations should be allowed to report what public figures say, regardless of whether it is true or false.

Otherwise, they said, for example, the press could not have reported last year on the charges lodged against Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth because Kerry's supporters said their charges were false.

News Organizations that Repeated Swift Boat Vets Lies Could be Liable

Shortly after the election results of 2004 I wrote that Kerry's team should go after the Swift Boat Liars with a defamation suit. Now it appears there is legal precedence that could be used to form a case. On Monday the Supreme Court refused to shield the news media from being sued for accurately reporting a politician's false charges against a rival.

If Kerry hopes to regain his reputation and show he's a fighter I urge him or his team to bring a case against Fox News and other high profile news organizations who broadcast the wildly false accusations of the Swift Boat Liars around the clock for weeks during August. More than standing up for his own reputation a lawsuit could make it more difficult for future GOP false and disgustingly baseless attacks. -IFK Editor

Justices Refuse to Shield Reports of False Charges

In their appeal to the high court, lawyers for the paper said news organizations should be allowed to report what public figures say, regardless of whether it is true or false.

Otherwise, they said, for example, the press could not have reported last year on the charges lodged against Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth because Kerry's supporters said their charges were false.

Thursday, March 24, 2005

TIME MAGAZINE: Kerry On Values, the Media, his Future

By PERRY BACON JR. (Link)

Last week John Kerry took a trip to Florida and Georgia as part of "thank you" tours he is taking around the country to visit past supporters and also attend fundraisers to help out Democrat candidates for 2006, such as Bill Nelson of Florida, who is running to keep his Senate seat. Riding through Atlanta in a nondescript blue van accompanied by a handful of aides and two writers, Kerry sounded at times like he was thrilled to be done campaigning ("this is the first time in Georgia in four years I'm not asking anybody for money" he joked at one stop) but at others like he was still trying to make his case to be President. He returned to President Bush's dismissal of his plan to cover the 11 million children as a government boondoggle, insisting repeatedly "it's not a government plan."

Kerry's strategy for his post-campaign career, in which he is looking to rally his base of supporters outside Washington to give him influence inside the Capitol, is reminiscent of two other ex-candidates: Howard Dean and John McCain. McCain leveraged his support from his 2000 race into a movement behind campaign finance reform, eventually forcing President Bush to sign a bill he didn't like. After his disastrous showing in the primaries, Dean campaigned for candidates all around the country and raised money from his supporters, efforts that earned praise from fellow Democrats that helped him win the chairmanship of the party this year. It's difficult to predict how successful Kerry will be: on one hand, in winning 59 million votes, the Massachusetts Senator has a much greater potential base than the other two ex-candidates, on the other hand, it's not clear he has the intensity of backing of Dean or the breadth of support of McCain, who is admired by Democrats, Republicans and the press.

Here is Kerry in his own words on some of the key subjects of the day:


On the role of faith in politics: "The values reflected in a broad array of religious faiths are being hijacked and it's important for us to take it head on. It's a very difficult thing to do in two or three months of the campaign, the atmospheres are not right for it, but now is the time for that. . . . I know that I was never taught that faith was a one-issue event. I've spent a lot of time rereading things to make sure I'm clear on it all. While we all have powerful beliefs about life and when it begins, the fact that one supports Roe v. Wade doesn't mean you're pro-abortion by any sense of the imagination. If you go back and read the New Testament and the Teaching of the Lord, nowhere in those teaching do I find Jesus talking about abortion or gays or intolerance. I find forgiveness and embracement."

On the changing America media: "A whole bunch of folks don't get news from anybody. 80% of Americans get 100% of their news from television, some of them get their news literally from Jon Stewart or from Jay Leno, David Letterman, Bill Maher, Saturday Night live or they get it from Fox. News has become entertainment and not necessarily an arbiter for what's true and I learned this first hand in the campaign. 77% of people who voted for George Bush believe that weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq. So that's the challenge."

On what Democrats must do to win: ''This is the real challenge. I became the nominee of our party in March and had 5 months to put together a national structure. Karl Rove and the Republicans had 6 years before that, two years running against Al Gore and 4 years (in the White House). And they spent 150 million dollars a year doing major analyses. They had time to analyze how people live and how their lives affect the choices people make. We haven't and we have to get our party on the same page. I'm convinced we can turn around [the party] and reclaim our leadership."

On the problem with politics today: " The real issues of concern to people have been shunted aside and a bunch of phony choices have been put in front of people. I love the fact that we're exporting democracy, it's a great hallmark of America, but we've got to practice democracy better right here at home."

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Congress hits a low in Schiavo debacle

Shame on the Republicans. How low will they go?

As it happens I was in Miami over the weekend as the tragic Schiavo case played out. I can tell you first hand that in Florida, on the street and in the papers, the sentiment is that Republicans are using this personal tragedy for political gain in the most disgusting way, trampling state rights, overstepping their constitutional authority, and pandering to a minority of ultra conservative religious right leaders who know nothing about the families involved. Is this still the United States, where we abide by democratic laws, or do we now live under the rule of the Republican Taliban? -IFK Editor

Congress hits a low in Schiavo debacle
BY CAROL MARIN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

I don't blame anyone for being anguished over Terri Schiavo's case. But I am appalled at Congress for cynically capitalizing on it. Most horrifying of all was the disgraced and disgraceful Tom DeLay, whose mind-boggling address to a conservative family forum in Washington on Friday set the stage for Congress' Palm Sunday stampede of state's rights and the rule of law. A tape recording of it was obtained by Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

"One thing that God has brought to us is Terri Schiavo, to help elevate the visibility of what is going on in America," the House Republican leader from Texas was heard to say.

DeLay, whose own legislative career may soon be on life support pending the continued investigation of his alleged ethical transgressions, unbelievably managed to insinuate his political plight into the suffering of Ms. Schiavo. "This is exactly the issue that is going on in America, of attacks against the conservative movement, against me and against many others," he said.

Do DeLay's delusions of political persecution really go that far? A conservative on the cross? Maybe someone should mention to Mr. DeLay this isn't about him.

And does Illinois' own Dennis Hastert, speaker of the House, let this all play out without a single expression of misgiving about the misuse of Congress in an issue that properly belongs to state courts?

One of the great tragedies for Terri Schiavo's family is that it had to go to court at all. But that happens sometimes in families.

As I think of it, I guess it could have happened in mine.

My father, years before he became ill, used to half-jokingly, half-seriously say, "Don't ever let anyone hook me up to some damn machine if I'm too sick to stop it. Step on the hose. Pull the plug."

If he said it once, he said it a hundred times. The problem was he would never write it down.

In September of 1989, my dad was placed on a ventilator in the intensive care unit of Evanston Hospital. His internist arrived after consulting with the heart specialist, the kidney man, the pulmonary expert and the neurologist. Every one of my dad's organs, it seemed, had its own doctor. And the doctors weren't all on the same page. The cardiologist said he could keep my dad's heart pumping for days, maybe weeks. The kidney man thought that part of his body was about to fail. Almost everything was shutting down, including my father's once-fine mind after a succession of little strokes. His eyes were closed, there was a tube down his throat, and we knew he wanted us, in his not-so-gentle words, to "step on the hose."

We were lucky. Heartbroken but united, my mother and sister and I were able to speak with one voice.

Another family, equally united, may have made an entirely different decision than we did. I honor and respect the differences among us.

But what happened in Washington this weekend deserves neither honor nor respect. It was a raw grab at a personal tragedy for political gain. Seven years and at least 17 state courtrooms have not produced a single dissenting judgement. Terri Schiavo, it has been ruled again and again, has the right to die as asserted by her husband and no chance of recovery if she continues to live.

This is not meant, in any way, as a criticism of her parents. If I were in their place, and if I believed as they believe, then I would do what they are doing.

But Congress? That's a different story.

Washington, it's clear, is a place where Republicans run scared of the religious right and Democrats just play dead.

To blatantly disregard and disrespect the considered rulings of state courts, to pass 11th hour legislation that allows one single, wrenching case to be re-done in federal courts, and to invoke due process when the real motive is to just delay is beyond shameful. Do the administration and those who agree with it only consider the work of state courts when they agree with them? Do they only believe in state's rights when they decide a state is right?

If that's the case, Congress, I guess, is just for the convenience of the moment and the clamor of the crowd.

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Kerry on Senate Vote Allowing ANWR Drilling

Below is a statement from Senator John Kerry on the Senate’s vote today to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. The Cantwell-Kerry amendment would have removed a provision in the president's budget that will allow oil companies to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It failed 49-51.

"Today we saw a Republican sneak attack on one of our most treasured natural wonders. It's a sad day when the voices of the American people are ignored and the Senate sells off America's public lands to the highest bidder."

"Our work is not done. In the last 24 hours alone, more than 260,000 Americans have stood with us in my online petition to fight to protect our Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. That fight is not over. This is more than a battle over the wildlife refuge; it's a battle over two very different visions of our energy future. The President has a plan to sell off our public lands to the special interests that his own scientists and economists admit will not make us less dependent on foreign oil and will not lower prices at the pump. We have a vision that will put America's energy future in the hands of Americans - by inventing our way to real energy independence and having energy sources that create jobs and lower prices."

"We must continue to fight to make sure that American ingenuity wins out over a special interest funded partisan agenda."

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

ACTION ALERT: Stop Alaska Wildlife Drilling

We have only 24 to 48 hours to try and save the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The Republicans are trying to sneak legislation through the Senate approving oil drilling and they are incredibly close to winning. We have to stop them.

I am joining with Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) in offering a critical amendment to stop this sneak attack on our environment. We will fight on the floor of the Senate, but we need you by our side.

There are seven key Republican Senators whose votes will decide the future of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Before they vote, we need to make sure they know that their constituents are watching, and that they will not be able to support drilling without anybody noticing.

Here are two critical steps we can take together to support our amendment to protect this National Wildlife Refuge:

1. Join the Citizens' Roll Call

First of all, take part in a massive fast-moving display of citizen support for the Arctic Refuge. Sign our Cantwell-Kerry Citizens' Roll Call now.

http://www.johnkerry.com/RollCall

To make our Citizens' Roll Call impossible to ignore, we have alerted the media, environmental advocates and my fellow Senators to a scrolling display of the names and home towns of the roll call signers. It is posted on our johnkerry.com website, where we hope to soon add your name and a running tally of the number of citizens on our Citizens' Roll Call.

2. Bring the fight to the home states of the seven senators

We need to launch emergency online advertising campaigns in the home states of those seven critical senators: Senator Coleman (MN), Senator Smith (OR), Senator Specter (PA), Senator Martinez (FL), Senator Lugar (IN), and Senators Gregg and Sununu (NH).

We need your help to bring our Save the Arctic Refuge message home in these six states. Help us fund an emergency ad campaign to make sure they know how strongly the people they represent feel about protecting the Arctic. Please make an emergency donation right now.

http://contribute.johnkerry.com/

When Senator Cantwell, myself and other Senators stand up in support of the Cantwell-Kerry Amendment, we will have powerful arguments on our side.
(I have recapped some of those arguments at the end of this email message)

But, to win, we need to be able to report directly to our Senate colleagues that massive numbers of citizens around the country - and in their own states - are rising up to demand that the Senate protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

That's why your immediate signature is so critical.

http://www.johnkerry.com/RollCall

The Bush Administration and its oil industry allies want to send a message that they can drill for oil wherever and whenever they want to - even if it means targeting a place as striking, pristine and irreplaceable as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

They don't care about putting America on a genuine path to energy independence. If they did, they'd support efforts to increase energy conservation and to create clean, renewable sources of energy that no terrorist can sabotage and no foreign government can seize.

Let me be very direct with you. It is going to take an immediate and impossible-to-ignore display of grassroots support to stop them. That's why your decision to sign our Cantwell-Kerry Amendment Citizens' Roll Call is so crucial.

Thank you for acting quickly on this vital request.

John Kerry


P.S. Senator Cantwell, who comes from a state in the heart of the Pacific Northwest, has - at considerable political risk - courageously stepped forward to join me in leading this fight. We need you to help us win it.

http://www.johnkerry.com/RollCall

HERE ARE YOUR SAVE THE ARCTIC REFUGE TALKING POINTS


  • The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's 19 million acres comprise one of the last places on earth where an intact expanse of arctic and sub arctic lands remains protected.
  • Drilling in the Arctic Refuge can't make even a small dent in meeting America's energy needs. U.S. Geological Survey scientists estimate that there is very likely only enough oil to supply America's needs for six months. And oil companies admit that, even that, won't be available for at least 10 years.
  • An irreplaceable natural treasure, the Arctic Refuge is home to caribou, polar bears, grizzly bears, wolves, golden eagles, snow geese and more. Millions of other birds use the Arctic Refuge to nest and as a critical staging area on their migratory journeys.
  • Of course, the Arctic Refuge supports more than wildlife. For a thousand generations, the Gwich'in people of Northeast Alaska and Northwest Canada have depended on it and lived in harmony with it. To them, the Arctic Coastal Plain is sacred ground.

Tuesday, March 08, 2005

Kerry Making News

Here is an overview of several stories I thought deserved some attention.

From our friends at http://kerryblog.blogspot.com

  • Kerry Critical of Bolton Nomination
  • Kerry Urges More Aggressive Stance Against Bush On Social Security


    Kerry Visits With Harvard Students
    Alexander I. Burns ’08, who attended the meeting, said he was impressed with Kerry’s performance.

    “I was very pleasantly surprised with his active engagement with people,” Burns said. “He seemed much more sincere and energetic in person than on television or in front of large audiences.”

    He added that he enjoyed the back-and-forth nature of the discussion, commenting that he thought a “productive dialogue” had taken place.

    Fournier also praised Kerry’s interactions with the students.

    “He seemed to really enjoy sharing thoughts with the students,” he said. “It was interesting the way he solicited advice from the students. He really wanted to hear the students’ opinions.”

    Read: Kerry Speaks At Institute of Politics Luncheon


    A Victory for Good Sense - Boston Globe
    US Senator John F. Kerry was optimistic, but cautiously so, after a round of bureaucratic maneuvering had put off -- perhaps permanently -- the deportation of Obain Attouoman, the popular Fenway High School teacher who was nearly shipped out of the country last week.
  • Monday, March 07, 2005

    Kennedy Supports Kerry in 2008

    While nothing is official and probably won't be for another 2 years or more, Senator Edward Kennedy threw his early support for the 2008 Presidential race to John Kerry should he decide to run again.

    "Oh yes," Kennedy replied when asked if he is sticking with Kerry despite Clinton's popularity surge. "And I have enormous respect for Sen. Clinton. I admire and respect her. She's qualified for the job, but my man is John Kerry."


    Full Story: Ted K `respects' Hillary, but Kerry gets his vote

    Friday, March 04, 2005

    Health Care for Kids: Follow Up

    By IFK Editor

    Shortly after the election dust had settled and President Bush claimed a "mandate" to dismantle Social Security Insurance, Kerry was already hard at work fighting for what he promised in his 2004 Presidential campaign: Health Care for Kids.

    So far his "Kids Come First Act" to provide Health Care for all children in the US has been silently ignored by the Republican lead congress, who would much prefer to make tax cuts for the rich permanent, while gutting social security, creating record deficits and forcing massive cuts to social programs in every state across America.

    The Republican Party talks and talks about values, yet turns their back on those most in need. That includes you too Red States. Some of you are especially hard hit with the Bush Budget. Meanwhile Kerry continues to fight for middle class, working families.

    As a follow up I wanted to direct people to the JohnKerry.com site where they've posted a sample of the 16,000 phone calls they've received from ordinary Americans asking that their children have access to health care.

    Some of the calls are very personal and tell of the struggles these parents and grandparents face when trying to get health care for a sick child if they don't have insurance. These are hard working good people, some working two jobs.

    America can do better. It must do better. Add your name to those who support the Kids Come First Act.